9 ‘harmless’ lies parents normalised that kids never really recover from

Olivia Reid by Olivia Reid | July 22, 2025, 7:15 am

My therapist leaned back in her chair, waiting. We’d been circling around something for twenty minutes—something about disappointment, about expectations, about why I kept insisting that certain things were “fine” when they clearly weren’t.

“Tell me about ice cream,” she said finally.

It was such an odd request that I laughed. But then the memory surfaced: being seven, walking past the Baskin-Robbins, pulling on my mother’s hand. “The machine’s broken,” she’d said, not even glancing at the window where I could clearly see other kids eating cones. “It’s always broken after 8 p.m.”

And I’d believed her. Not just that night, but for years. Even as a teenager, some part of me thought ice cream shops had unreliable equipment that mysteriously failed at convenient times. It wasn’t until college, working at a frozen yogurt place, that the absurdity hit me. Machines don’t collectively break at parent-convenient hours.

“So what else was ‘broken’?” my therapist asked.

The question opened a floodgate. The TV that only worked during certain hours. The pool that was “closed for cleaning” whenever we drove past. The toy store that was perpetually “out of” whatever I’d seen on commercials. A whole childhood architecture built on small, protective lies.

In therapy rooms across the country, these conversations are happening more frequently. The lies our parents called white, harmless, even necessary—therapists now understand how they shaped our relationship with truth itself. Not because our parents were malicious, but because they were human, tired, and doing their best with the tools they had.

1. “The ice cream machine is broken”

Last month, I watched a father use this exact line on his daughter outside our neighborhood gelato place. She couldn’t have been more than six, and her face fell in that particular way children’s faces do when the universe disappoints them. I almost said something. Almost.

Instead, I thought about my friend from book club who still can’t ask for what she wants directly. She’ll circle around requests, prepare for rejection before she’s even asked. “I realized I literally expected things to be unavailable,” she told me once. “Restaurants would be full, stores would be closed, experiences would be somehow inaccessible. Because that’s what I learned—wanting things too much meant they’d be ‘broken.'”

Child development researchers call this learned helplessness by proxy. When children repeatedly hear that desired things are unavailable due to external circumstances, they internalize a worldview where disappointment is inevitable and desire itself becomes suspect.

2. “We’ll see” (meaning absolutely not)

Every parent knows this phrase. It’s the soft no, the conflict avoidance, the “maybe later” that means “never.” But for kids, it’s a lesson in limbo.

I was twelve that summer I kept a list—all the things my parents said “we’ll see” about. Camping trip. New bike. Sleepover at Jessica’s house. Pet hamster. By August, I’d learned the code. “We’ll see” meant “stop asking,” but it also meant something else: keep hoping. That’s the cruel genius of it. It doesn’t kill the want, just suspends it indefinitely.

Now I catch myself doing it in relationships—that inability to give clear answers, keeping people in hopeful suspension rather than risking their disappointment with honesty. My therapist calls it a pattern of “perpetual maybe,” this learned behavior of avoiding definitive statements.

Children who grow up with “we’ll see” learn to live in perpetual possibility. They become adults who struggle with decision-making, who keep multiple options open past the point of practicality, who can’t quite believe in permanence. One colleague told me she had three job offers on hold because actually choosing felt impossible. “What if I pick wrong?” she asked. “What if the other options disappear?”

I’ve come to believe these lies teach children that the universe conspires against their wants. Later, as adults, we struggle to advocate for themselves because we’ve learned that wanting is futile.

3. “This won’t hurt a bit”

The needle went in, and it hurt exactly as much as a needle hurts. Not unbearable, but definitely not the “tiny pinch” or “won’t hurt a bit” the nurse had promised. This lie—the minimization of physical discomfort—teaches children that their body’s signals can’t be trusted.

Those who work with chronic pain patients see this pattern frequently: “I see adults who apologize for being in pain. They’ve learned that acknowledging discomfort makes them weak or difficult. That pattern often starts with well-meaning adults who thought they were helping by minimizing.”

The research on pain perception and childhood messaging is clear: children who are taught to expect pain handle it better than those who are told it won’t exist. The lie creates a disconnect between experience and expectation that can last a lifetime.

I think about this every time I minimize my own discomfort, every time I say “I’m fine” through obvious distress. Where did I learn that pain was something to be denied rather than acknowledged?

4. “Your goldfish went to live on a farm”

Death is hard. Explaining death to a four-year-old is harder. So Fluffy goes to a farm upstate, and goldfish join their friends in the ocean, and somehow dead pets find better lives elsewhere. It’s protective, almost beautiful in its creativity. It’s also a lie that shapes how we process loss.

When I was eight, my parents told me our dog went to “help other puppies.” I spent years imagining him in some kind of canine training facility, teaching younger dogs to fetch. When my grandmother died two years later, I kept waiting for someone to tell me where she’d really gone.

Therapists who specialize in grief counseling report that adults who learned about death through deception often struggle with closure. They search for hidden meanings, alternative explanations, ways to undo what’s done. The farm lie, meant to spare pain, instead creates a template for denial that persists through real, human losses.

5. “Money doesn’t grow on trees” (while spending freely on themselves)

The mixed messages around money create their own special chaos. “We can’t afford that” at the toy store, followed by bags from Nordstrom hidden in the closet. The lesson isn’t really about money—it’s about worth, about who deserves what, about the secret economics of family life.

I grew up watching this double standard play out in grocery stores and malls. No to name-brand cereal, yes to dad’s golf membership. No to the school field trip, yes to mom’s spa weekend. The math never made sense because it wasn’t meant to.

Now I see it everywhere—friends who simultaneously overspend and feel guilty about every purchase, who can’t price their own work fairly, who apologize for having nice things while compulsively buying more. A financial advisor once told me that half her job is therapy. “People’s money stories start in childhood,” she said. “And they’re usually built on lies about scarcity and abundance.”

6. “I’m not upset” (with clenched jaw and tight voice)

This might be the most damaging lie of all—the emotional dishonesty that teaches children to distrust their own perceptions. When a parent says “I’m fine” through tears or “I’m not angry” while slamming cabinets, children learn that feelings are things to be denied, that their ability to read emotions is faulty.

My mother was particularly skilled at this. “I’m not disappointed,” she’d say, her whole body radiating disappointment. “I’m not angry,” through gritted teeth. I learned to read the subtext, the actual message beneath the words, but I also learned something else: that feelings were dangerous things that adults lied about.

The research on emotional validation in childhood is unequivocal: children need their perceptions confirmed, not denied. When parents lie about their emotional states, children lose trust in their most fundamental navigation system.

Now, in adult relationships, I triple-check everything. “Are you sure you’re not mad?” I ask my partner, who has never once slammed a cabinet. That childhood programming runs deep—if emotions can be denied despite all evidence, how can you trust anything?

7. “If you tell the truth, you won’t get in trouble”

Then you tell the truth about breaking the vase, and the yelling starts anyway. This lie—the false promise of immunity for honesty—creates some of the deepest trust issues therapists see in adult patients.

I learned this lesson at nine, when I admitted to reading my sister’s diary. The punishment was swift and severe, despite the promise of clemency for truth-telling. The lesson was clear: honesty is a trap. Truth doesn’t protect you; it gives them ammunition.

I’ve heard therapists describe adults who literally cannot deliver bad news to their partners. My ex-colleague, forty-three years old, financially independent, in a loving marriage, couldn’t tell her husband she’d dented the car. But that childhood programming was so strong—truth equals punishment, despite what they say.

We become adults who elaborate small lies, who create complex cover stories for minor mistakes, who can’t quite believe that honesty might actually be safe. Every confession feels like stepping into a trap, even when all evidence suggests otherwise.

8. “We love you both exactly the same”

Siblings know. They always know. The lie of equal love, meant to prevent jealousy, instead creates a framework where children doubt all emotional truths. If this obvious lie is being told, what else is false?

My brother was the athlete, the easy child, the one who made my parents glow with pride. I was the complicated one, the reader, the one who asked too many questions. “We love you both exactly the same,” they’d insist, while every action suggested otherwise.

The equality lie teaches children that love is performance, that feelings must be distributed in careful portions, that natural preferences and connections are shameful secrets. Years of therapy helped me understand why compliments felt suspicious, why every expression of love seemed like something people were supposed to say rather than something they meant—it all traced back to this first lie about equal love that nobody actually believed.

9. “This is for your own good”

The ultimate parental override: this will hurt, you’ll hate it, but trust us. Sometimes it’s true—vaccines are for your own good. But when it’s applied to everything from unnecessary haircuts to forced activities to cruel punishments, it teaches children that their own sense of good and bad can’t be trusted.

My parents used this for everything. Piano lessons I despised (“You’ll thank us later”). Friendships with kids I disliked (“It’s good to expand your circle”). Clothes that made me feel awful (“You need to look presentable”). The message was clear: your feelings about your own life are irrelevant.

The “own good” lie creates adults who struggle with boundaries, who accept mistreatment as medicine, who can’t quite distinguish between necessary discomfort and unnecessary suffering. They stay in bad relationships because growth is supposed to hurt. They accept workplace abuse because challenges build character.

Final thoughts

Back in my therapist’s office, we’d made a list. All the small lies, all the protected truths, all the ways reality had been managed and massaged for my supposed benefit. The list was longer than I’d expected.

“Now what?” I asked.

She smiled. “Now you get to decide which truths you want to tell.”

Our parents were protecting us from disappointment, from complexity, from their own limitations. They were human, tired, doing their best with children who ask endless questions at inconvenient times. The lies came from love as often as exhaustion.

But understanding the architecture of these lies—how they built our sense of what’s possible, what’s real, what’s safe to want or feel or know—that’s where the work begins. In therapy rooms and coffee shops and late-night conversations, we’re unlearning the protective fictions that once kept us safe but now keep us small.

The question isn’t whether we’ll lie to our own children. We will. The question is which lies we’ll choose, and whether we’ll recognize them for what they are: not truths, not necessities, but choices. Small ones, maybe. But choices that echo longer than we think, shaping the adults our children will become, one “broken” ice cream machine at a time.